Friday, March 13, 2009

Slavery and the Constitution

With our current President and the talk of race and with Pook's comment I thought we should look at the issues of slavery and what the Constitution really says. No commentary, let's just deal with facts.

In 1776 the U.S. was one of hundreds of nations that had slaves. At that time there were approx. a half million slaves mostly in 4 southern states. The practice of slavery was brought to the US from Britain where it had been practiced for centuries. It was a way of life. That doesn't make it right it's just the way it was. Many of our founding fathers including John Adams, Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton spoke out against the practice. Many others owned slaves but as seen in their writings were conflicted about the practice.

In 1774 Thomas Jefferson in his draft to the First Continental Congress wrote "The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies where it was unhappily introduced in their infant state." By the time of the U.S. Constitution, every state (except Georgia) had at least denounced or suspended the importation of slaves.

However, like politics today there are opposing sides and when it came time for the final draft of the Constitution compromises were made. The southern states wanted the slaves counted as "whole" persons so they could keep their House seats (up to 40% of the population in many states were slaves). The northern states wanted to penalize the slave practice by not counting them and thus make the practice less attractive. The 3/5's of a person was the compromise. Compromise #2 was that after 1808 no more slaves could be brought in. This was the compromise between abolishing it then to never ending it.

The term slave and slavery were kept out of the Constitution and as Madison's notes state the delegates "thought it wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men".

There is no doubt slavery was indeed the imperfection that marred the American founding. Those who founded this nation chose to make practical compromises for the sake of establishing in principle a new nation dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. In 1837 John Quincy Adams said "Never from their lips was heard one syllable of attempt to justify the institution of slavery. They universally considered it as a reproach fastened upon them by the unnatural step-mother country and they saw that before the principles of the Declaration of Independence slavery, in common with every mode of oppression, was destined sooner or later to be banished from the earth."

So the slavery compromises included in the Constitution can be understood to be compromises needed to establish a new nation rather than a surrender of principle. But in the end it took a bloody civil war to bring about the original intention of the Constitution by many of it's founders. How you view this country will ultimately color how you view this issue of slavery. Was slavery a US institution established and practiced by a majority meant to dehumanize another race for economic gain or was it a long held world practice that came to our land with deep roots that took the lives of many men to overturn? Reading many of our founders notes I choose to believe the latter. Slavery was never meant to be the law of this land.

3 comments:

  1. "slavery compromises....Slavery was never meant to be the law of this land."
    - Hell of a compromises, but it doesn't change the fact that it was that way. So what about the 18th Amendment? Was that never meant to be the law of this land. It is what it is... spin it anyway you want.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What would you have suggested they do to solve the impasse? Civil War #2? Maybe if the Dems would vote for a line item veto we wouldn't have to make compromises. Slavery was part of our past, when can we get past it? I suppose you think we should pay reparations also.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of my daughters has always been headstrong. When she was a child, we told her and told her not to play with the stove. One day when we weren’t looking she turned on the stove and burnt her fingers.

    Needless to say she never played with the stove again. If fact, she still hate cooking to this day.  Sorry, just kidding.

    The point is if we had never gone through the painful slavery issue, we never would have been able to grow past the horror that it was. Even with that it took the worse loss of American life and casualties in history to change the practice.

    Citizens who didn’t own land were not originally allowed to vote. You had to be a Christian to hold public office. Women would not be allowed to vote for decades. Some issues, even with knowledge of right and wrong, just slip under the door because people look the other way.

    That doesn’t mean just because the majority of the nation’s citizens believe or feel a certain way that it makes it right either. Slavery wasn’t right before the Civil War and then wrong after it because the majority of the people felt so. Slavery wasn’t wrong because the North prevailed on the battlefield. Slavery was wrong because it denied the inalienable rights bestowed upon men/women by their Creator.

    ReplyDelete